The Court thanks both counsels for their contributions. Having considered the arguments put forward by both, it would to like to make the following comments:

To Mall:

• You are requested to produce as evidence the full contents of the conversation between your client and Imkitopia, as referenced in both parties' testimonies.
  
• The counsel for the Cabinet contends that the conversation between your client and Imkitopia was in response for actions by Roavin, unrelated to any attempt to form a bilateral relationship. Does your client stand by his assertion on the nature of this conversation?
  
• The Court similarly recognises your concerns on the matter of the term used for Item D of your client's proscription, and will rule accordingly in a subsequent comment.
  
• The Court recognises your right to cross-examine evidence against your client, but also recognises that the Judicial Act requires a certain level of confidentiality for evidence of a classified nature. Therefore, it will make a determination on its possible availability to you once it has had a chance to review the evidence.
  

To Roavin:

• If Ever Wandering Souls is being proscribed, the assumption is that he is being hostile. In fact, Items B through E set out to support the determination of hostility. Was there then a purpose to Item A, which you claim merely establishes that there was hostility in the first place?
  
• You are requested to produce as evidence the full contents of the conversation between Ever Wandering Souls and Imkitopia, as referenced in both parties' testimonies.
  
• Does the Cabinet consider the West Pacific to be a partner?
  
• You are requested to clarify, for the record of this case, the exact reasons why the West Pacific and the East Pacific blacklisted The Black Hawks, with reference to the role that Ever Wandering Souls had in these blacklistings.
  
• There is a very clear difference between "blackmail" and "bullying". Does the Cabinet intend to amend the reasoning for its proscriptions after the fact, as was just attempted with the phrasing of Item D?
  
• You are requested to provide, through private means, the unredacted contents of the evidence that supports Item E, for their consideration by the Court.