(07-18-2022, 02:34 PM)HumanSanity Wrote: Can you elaborate on this? How would it "destabilize the cabinet" and what are the consequences of that?

Several problems with changing ministries:
-if few or no ministries are fixed, is there not a risk in the long term of not having enough ministries in the cabinet?
- if a ministry is created during a mandate, it is not guaranteed that it will continue for the next mandate, for example if its creator is not renewed or if he no longer wishes to have this position. So, can we judge the effectiveness of a ministry if it only exists for 3 or 4 months?
- if someone proposes a ministry project and he has his own ideas to carry it out, what guarantee do we have on the understanding of the PM of this project and does this not risk degrading the relations between the PM and his ministers if they don't always agree?

The purpose of this proposal is to "liberalize" the ministerial functions, whereas on the contrary it would be necessary to reinforce the ministries already existing (by adding the owl to them) by registering their functions and the means they have to carry them out in the charter

I agree with jay coop that our system is too rigid but it is not a good idea to deregulate ministries.

I am not against the idea of ​​a cabinet by appointment but while maintaining the ministries as they are (plus the owl).