(08-18-2022, 02:07 PM)A bee Wrote: That has been revised.

Where? I'm not seeing a change in the post where your draft is.
 

(08-18-2022, 02:07 PM)A bee Wrote: They may set their own "rules" but they are still all under TSP jurisdiction. This is important as - if I were to break RMB rule of multi-posting or single-word posting, I'd be under RMB jurisdiction. This makes no sense to me. Instead, the RMB can agree to formulate such a rule within their own community and impose small-scale sanctions against non-compliers. However, the ultimate authority should lie within the TSP. Essentially, my issue is with the "constitutional laws".

I don't think this is what your proposal does. From my perspective, what your proposal does is expand the requirement for sub-community "consent" to Assembly legislative changes, without defining what those sub-communities are, which just creates an imprecise mess for actual implementation.