(What I am saying here applies to this proposal as well as to the others concerning the LC)

I don't see why there is such a hatred of the LC, especially since it is with the Delegate the ROs most appreciated by people, obviously because they are elected by them, and it is not because the LC seems useless or dysfunctional than it really is.

The LC cannot prevent spam but can at least guarantee a minimum of order in the RMB. And it's not by replacing it with "appointed mods", which will for sure be inactive and unappreciated, (because the principle of an election is that you need determined volunteers to participate, unlike appointments), that the problem would be solved.

(08-22-2022, 03:58 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: At some point we need to face the music here and realize that we are never going to “get consent” from the RMB to get rid of the LC. It doesn’t matter if somebody has never once thought about the LC and never cared before, the moment you ask them to give it up they’re gonna say no.

Well it's true, people will never vote for its abolition, let's do it ourselves without them being able to contradict!!
(You will probably bring out the typical arguments: "The assembly perfectly represents the gameside community", which will not be the case before there are 1000 legislators, or "there is no gameside and forumside", but seeing the hostility you have to the RMB, and the hostility that some proposals have to gameside in general (such as the proposal on the election of the Delegate), I can only contradict these kinds of arguments.)

Quote:(5) At the start of each Local Council election, a six-day gameside poll shall be conducted that shall ask whether to retain the Local Council as an institution.

I don't really see the point of that, but the idea of ​​asking people quite regularly what they think about the LC could be good.