(04-15-2018, 06:48 PM)Roavin Wrote: No no, I meant using the courts more in general.

I imagine the court already has the power to issue restraining orders and the like. I’m reluctant to get into another generalized discussion about the court though. We’re talking about this very specific issue of PNG/PRO.

@Bel: I think you’re caught up on an issue that doesn’t actually exist. “Non-legislator” = foreigner. If that needs to be edited, fine. But at the end of the day, merely parking a nation in TSP doesn’t make somebody a TSPer and grant them special rights. That’s ridiculous.

To take my last example, if the Cabinet was preparing to PNG the Queen of Balder, and she created a nation and put it in TSP, that doesn’t suddenly make her a TSPer. That’s an absurd idea that would be abused by (and HAS BEEN prior to Kris’s ruling) enemies and aggressors.

That’s what I mean when I say people bloviate about civil rights without taking the game into any kind of context.

Anyways, your constitutionality argument is still wrong and still in contradiction with the PRO law you wrote. At the end of the day, you don’t agree with the entire concept of dealing with problematic people on an individual basis (but think it’s just fine banning everybody in a group based on the actions of the few??). I’m not sure why the bill, then, should be written around or altered for your personal belief on the topic.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk