We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [2003] Legality of Closed Local Council Elections
#8

Acknowledging Volaworand's amicus curiae brief, I would appreciate it if the Election Commissioner and the Local Council (collectively or individually) could voluntarily answer the following questions through a post below at their earliest convenience:
  1. Who made the decision to limit voting in the Local Council elections to native WA residents? On what basis did they make this decision?
  2. Is having a native WA nation in the region a requirement to be considered a member of the Coalition under Article III of the Charter? (cf. HCLQ 1708 Members of the Coalition)
  3. If not, how does limiting the vote accord with Article III, Section 4 of the Charter? (i.e. 'No member may be denied the right to vote or hold office, unless prohibited by constitutional law.')
While the deadline for filing amicus curiae briefs remains the same (i.e. there are approximately 24 hours to do so), answers to the above questions by Local Councillors or the Election Commissioner may be accepted outside this window. This is in acknowledgement of the fact that these questions have been posted late in the window for the filing of briefs.
Former Associate Justice of the High Court of the South Pacific (4 December 2019 to 5 February 2021)
[-] The following 1 user Likes Nat's post:
  • Auphelia
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 08-05-2020, 10:10 AM
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 08-06-2020, 10:37 AM
RE: [2003] Legality of Closed Local Council Elections - by Nat - 08-09-2020, 12:58 AM
Requested Opinion - by Auphelia - 08-09-2020, 04:11 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .