We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Re: TBH, OWL, and Commend Two Baggers
#13

(12-02-2020, 11:13 PM)Penguin Wrote: I see what you’re saying Phoenix and while I’m inclined to agree are we thinking that we can put them on a full prescription for like six months and then drop it down to regional ?

Your proposal of this suggests that you see a proscription more as a "punishment" for TBH than as a necessary security action. I just want to make sure we're all on the same page: is the Cabinet proscribing TBH, despite it not being totally necessary, in order to punish them? Or is it proscribing TBH because it actually believes they are an active threat that must be prevented from getting near the region?

If it's the latter, then your proposal makes no sense at all. If it's the former, are we sure that's a good use of proscriptions?
[Image: AfI6yZX.png]
Aumeltopia ~
  
[Image: fKnK6O4.png]
Auphelia Wrote:Raccoons are bandits! First they steal your food . . .
and then your heart/identity!


Messages In This Thread
RE: TBH, OWL, and Commend Two Baggers - by Roavin - 11-20-2020, 12:14 PM
RE: TBH, OWL, and Commend Two Baggers - by Roavin - 11-20-2020, 12:43 PM
RE: Re: TBH, OWL, and Commend Two Baggers - by Somyrion - 12-02-2020, 11:46 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .