We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Assembly Discussion on OWL Reform
#7

I personally see the question of "how should OWL work/process votes" as a distinct question from "should OWL be a standalone Ministry/its leadership be part of the elected Cabinet".

OWL can be its own Ministry and still follow the exact same process it currently does. OWL could also have its process wildly altered after discussion by the Direction and their Staff and not be an equal Ministry seat. 

Perhaps an elected Ministry portfolio could be a mechanism by which to induce change to OWL and accountability for its structure and leadership. These are certainly interrelated questions, but they are not the same, and I'd hate for the response to the questions raised by the original post or the discussion points in the Cabinet thread to simply be "make it a Ministry".
Minister of Foreign Affairs
General of the South Pacific Special Forces
Ambassador to Balder
Former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense

[Image: rank_general.min.svg] [Image: updates_lifetime_3.min.svg] [Image: detags_lifetime_4.min.svg] [Image: defenses_lifetime_4.min.svg]

[Image: ykXEqbU.png]


Messages In This Thread
RE: Assembly Discussion on OWL Reform - by HumanSanity - 08-22-2021, 09:52 PM
RE: Assembly Discussion on OWL Reform - by Luca - 08-22-2021, 09:59 PM
RE: Assembly Discussion on OWL Reform - by Roavin - 08-23-2021, 10:04 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .