(08-26-2021, 05:37 PM)HumanSanity Wrote: In an ideal world, it would be a group of people who discuss and debate the merits of each WA proposal before it comes to vote, come to a collective opinion, write/codify that opinion and its reasoning, publish that opinion, and then the Delegate votes in the direction of that opinion.

What would this look like this in practice? I think Kris might be thinking OWL shouldn't be so open-ended, but should instead be kind of like a membership-based thing. Is that what you're talking about, too?