Looks like you just did on the RMB

In all fairness, I concur with Kris, I do not think this is a threat so much as the Assembly putting an underperforming group on notice. The LC might very well create a good solution, or they don't and the Assembly decides to act (or also chooses not to act).

-Griffindor/Ebonhand
-Current Roles/Positions
-Legislator 2/24/20-
-High Court Justice 6/7/20-
-South Pacific Coral Guard 11/17/20-
-Minister of Engagement 6/17/22-

-Past Roles/Positions
-Legislator 7/3/16-4/10/18
-Secretary of State 4/3/20-2/24/21
-Chair of the APC 9/24/16-5/31/17
-Vice-Chair of the APC 6/1/17-4/10/18
-Local Council Member 7/1/17-11/17/17
-Citizen 5/2012-12/2014 and  2/26/16-7/3/2016

Reply

Just so you all know, I've telegrammed both the Local and Deputy Councillors about this.

Reply

Looks like you just did on the RMB

In all fairness, I concur with Kris, I do not think this is a threat so much as the Assembly putting an underperforming group on notice. The LC might very well create a good solution, or they don't and the Assembly decides to act (or also chooses not to act).

That's hardly an official notification. If the Assembly wants to tell the Local Councillors to do something, y'all better have that process figured out.

Listen: When you "put someone on notice" with a "consequence" if they don't follow through ... that's the definition of a threat. End of story. I'm not debating dictionary definitions with you all.

Honestly, this was just an ill-thought-out resolution on a number of levels. At best this should have been made prior to an election so the people running for the LC knew what they were getting into. However, you know changed the job requirements and expectations after people were already elected. Like — surprise! People who didn't vote for you now are dictating your job! 

I'll also point out that you can't legislate activity. If any of the people who voted for this are that interested you could have run for LC ... and made changes.

-tsunamy
[forum admin]

Reply