Charter Amendment Take 2 |
(03-15-2015, 03:43 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: Two clarifications: Sorry, Consulate, my mistake. And it's still not closed, so I maintain my point. (03-15-2015, 03:44 PM)Escade Wrote: Didn't we cancel a treaty with them because LWU went defunct for a while? It's very active for a defunct organization. One could even call it alive. (03-15-2015, 03:45 PM)Sopo Wrote: This post is all I can find from Pen on this. And hence why I asked Escade to back up their claims. We can not prove that which does not exist.
"Dali and BGP. You have both been rejected due to security issues. As per the new regulations feel free to appeal to the assembly."
I feel like that's self-explanatory but if not the court system has recently made some sort of statement on security risks. Escade ~ Positions Held in TSP ~ Delegate | Vice Delegate Minister of Regional Affairs, | Minister of Foreign Affairs | Minister of Military Affairs ~ The Sparkly One ~ My Pinterest
"You're a security threat because you are one" is not even close to being an explanation.
More like a childhood taunt, if anything.
Well both people were given the chance to appeal. They did so. I may not agree with the outcomes but I believe in the process. It's obvious you don't. We agree to disagree.
Escade ~ Positions Held in TSP ~ Delegate | Vice Delegate Minister of Regional Affairs, | Minister of Foreign Affairs | Minister of Military Affairs ~ The Sparkly One ~ My Pinterest
And the appeal process requires a 75% Assembly approval. A citizenship request does not.
If we're going to go down that road, Escade, remove the Vice-Delegate from the process entirely and replace it with a 75% required approval vote from the Assembly on every applicant, every time. Still waiting on that link to the explanation, by-the-by. |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |