We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

TSU + SAM 4 TSP
#11

The concentration of power in the same few hands is an issue that TSP, and NS at large, has been dealing with for some time. Where do you stand on it and how will you address it in another term?

Escade

~ Positions Held in TSP ~
Delegate | Vice Delegate 
Minister of Regional Affairs, | Minister of Foreign Affairs | 
Minister of Military Affairs
~ The Sparkly One ~


My Pinterest




 
Reply
#12

(07-17-2015, 09:54 PM)Escade Wrote: The concentration of power in the same few hands is an issue that TSP, and NS at large, has been dealing with for some time. Where do you stand on it and how will you address it in another term?

Thanks for the question Es! Honestly, I think concentration of power in the region can be a good or a bad thing. I think it's good in the way that you have experienced people in positions, and, from an in game mechanism, there's a security from having high levels of endos/influence.

That said, I think we need to make sure there are ways for new people to get involved. This is part of the reason why I asked Sam, as a promising new member of government, to be my vice delegate. Additionally, this is why I see the role as delegate as somewhat hands-off. I'm not looking to make my mark, but rather looking to facilitate others while acting as a somewhat senior statesman.

In regard to your second point on concentration of power across NS, I agree is a bit of a problem. It makes odd bedfellows and complicates things unnecessarily. That said, I'm not sure there's much we can do per se, since much of that is beyond our control. What we can do is facilitate an active and engaged region here with a deep bench of players looking to get involved, as we have now. That way, TSP always has a set of newbies/natives who have a voice, but we also can welcome views of others within NS, as well, without becoming a satellite region.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Reply
#13

FTR, there is plenty of chances for new people to get involved. Chances are, I could've won the November Elections if I'd accepted my nomination for Justice.

Reply
#14

(07-18-2015, 12:41 AM)TAC Saxton Wrote: FTR, there is plenty of chances for new people to get involved. Chances are, I could've won the November Elections if I'd accepted my nomination for Justice.

Absolutely. My intention wasn't to say that there aren't ways to get involved -- certainly our elections are a great way. I suppose I was thinking more along the lines of making sure we have appointment/volunteer roles like the Fellowship Programme or SPSF (and are recruiting for them) so people can gain experience.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Reply
#15

I was speaking in regards to Escade's bit about the concentration of power. Being new is fine, but the quest for an elected position involves working your ass off, maintaining a decent image and contributing to the community. No hero skips straight to the end, no obstacles overcome, no lessons learned.

Reply
#16

What do you think is a better sign of success at the end of a cabinet term?
A) Being the clear favorite to being re-elected
B) Having someone from your staff being able to run and win against you.
The 16th Delegate of The South Pacific
Reply
#17

(07-19-2015, 04:47 PM)southern bellz Wrote: What do you think is a better sign of success at the end of a cabinet term?
A) Being the clear favorite to being re-elected
B) Having someone from your staff being able to run and win against you.

Wow. Thanks for such an interesting and thought-provoking question SB.

I'm of two minds here. One, I certainly don't want to take credit for work anyone else spearheaded. Both Feir and Henn have had robust terms in their ministries, and while I hope I helped foster/support that, I don't want to take credit for it. They did that and should be aptly credited.

That said, I do think the ability to have a spirited discussion and several platforms, is a boon to the region. And, I'd sooner have the debate we're having instead of running unopposed as last term.

I suppose, at large, I'd consider my NS career a "success" if I'm remembered for fostering growth in TSP. As such, I'll hesitantly go with the later.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Reply
#18

One question for BOTH of you to answer.

What is your plan for this next term?
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
Reply
#19

(07-20-2015, 06:34 PM)Punchwood Wrote: One question for BOTH of you to answer.

What is your plan for this next term?

By both ... do you mean one answer together? Or one answer a piece?
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Reply
#20

My plan to commit to the issues as outlined in my campaign platform and otherwise keep the region moving forward.

I trust Sam will answer the question as he sees fit.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .