| TRR treaty |
Brace yourselves.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Huh...it seems we have a treaty with Kantrias. Only now have I noticed that.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Mhmm. Was passed under my tenure as Chair. I believe we were assured that Kantrias was a super-active ally of ours, but it was clear to me that the only reason the treaty was written was because Kantrias was an imperialist region created by a popular gameplayer. We never actually did much with them, and now with their creator gone, Kantrias is likely to fade away.
Ah yes. The one Belschaft didn't want to pass.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Nothing. I had just noticed that and didn't want to start a whole new thread.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Before I post anything publicly, wanted to see what the general thoughts are with the TRR treaty not including as military component as Bels suggested?
I will say, for one, I wasn't aware that the TNI and TRR were actively at war with each other when discussing this treaty. (I had assumed there was standard animosity from the R/D ish.) But, if we can have some of agreement in this vein with strong support from the Assembly, it seems like a better option to me than either barely getting through or -- as it seems now -- more likely having the whole thing fail.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Well...we did mention there was a war somewhere in this thread, in the first pages I think. I recall saying it was a stupid war because of the same reasons Glen mentioned in the Assembly thread, and because it unnecessarily limits our foreign affairs.
I am giving some thought to that option, although I remain convinced that in the end we would be talking about the same thing, just with a different name (NAP instead of Treaty). This proposal doesn't create a military alliance as much as it enables the possibility of military cooperation, depending on how both parties agree at any given time. We should explain that. I do find it a bit encouraging how Bel is responding to this Treaty. It's far better than I thought. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Personally, I can't stand bickering over semantics. If we think an NAP would have the same effect as a Treaty and the NAP stops dissent, I'd go for the NAP. Or call it an NAP despite it being a Treaty. Whatever.
In any case, I feel ill-prepared to engage much this this debate, so publicly I'm not going to say anything until it gets motioned to a vote.
-tsunamy
[forum admin] |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 3 Guest(s) |