Poll: Are you in favor of the below amendment?

Altmoras · 09-11-2017, 06:36 PM

A motion and a second have been received for the following amendment to Section 1 of the Military Code.

This is a vote on a general law, and requires a simple majority to pass.

The voting period is three (3) days. Voting will end on September 14th at 6:37 PM EDT.

The debate thread can be found here.

Quote:1. Command Structure

(1) The South Pacific Special Forces (“SPSF”) will be led by the Minister of Military Affairs and a panel of three Generals needing to be approved by a simple majority of the assembly. Two more generals may be appointed, but these require a 60% confirmation by the assembly. The Minister of Military Affairs may appoint more Generals at her discretion, but these require a 75% majority to confirm.
(2) Further ranks will be bestowed at the discretion of the General Corps.
(3) All new SPSF members will be designated the rank of Trainee until such time as they have a complete understanding of the Code of Conduct and NS military gameplay.
(4) Beyond the Minister of Military Affairs and General Corps, the rankings will be as follows from next highest on down; Officer, Soldier, Trainee.
(5) The General Corps is responsible for the planning of and overseeing of all missions of the SPSF.
(6) Officers can lead operations and give orders on behalf of the General Corps.

Benevolent Thomas-Today at 11:15 AM
"I'm not sure if Altmoras has ever been wrong about anything."

(This post was last modified: 09-16-2017, 06:42 AM by Altmoras.)

**Seraph** · 09-12-2017, 02:32 AM

Nay

Sent from my KOB-L09 using Tapatalk

Founder of the Church of the South Pacific [Forum Thread] [Discord], a safe place to discuss spirituality for people of all faiths and none (currently looking for those interested in prayer and/or "home" groups);
And The Silicon Pens [Discord], a writer's group for the South Pacific and beyond!

Yahweo usenneo ir varleo, ihraneo jurlaweo hraseu seu, ir jiweveo arladi.

Salma 145:8

translate

Altmoras · 09-16-2017, 06:41 AM

With a voting record of 7-24 the amendment fails to pass.

Benevolent Thomas-Today at 11:15 AM
"I'm not sure if Altmoras has ever been wrong about anything."

(This post was last modified: 09-16-2017, 06:42 AM by Altmoras.)

**Farengeto** · 09-17-2017, 12:15 AM

(09-16-2017, 09:35 PM)rolandarmstrong Wrote: . . . . . . . .. . . ... *Frowns*

You were already warned. Post off-topic in a voting thread again and there will be penalties.

Poll: Are you in favor of the below amendment? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Aye	19.44%	7	19.44%
Nay	63.89%	23	63.89%
Abstain	16.67%	6	16.67%
Total		36 vote(s)	100%