We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Government positions
#41

Provided that in general, the division is kept, I do not understand why members of the Judicial Branch in times of emergency in terms of activity, are to be actively disbarred from filling junior roles in the government.
#42

It's a conflict of interests situation. Justices shouldn't have privileged Cabinet information, nor should they have an interest in the success of Cabinet policies. Activity isn't a reason to introduce those COIs. There are other people who can fill those positions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#43

There's also the inherent conflict between the executive and a branch of government meant to, to a certain degree, hold it to account.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator

[Image: B9ytUsy.png]
#44

Now up for a vote.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .