| [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Judicial Act |
(02-01-2019, 03:39 AM)Roavin Wrote:(01-31-2019, 09:20 PM)Ryccia Wrote: Opposed. The Assembly should have a say, not an one-sided choice. On this note, and just to confirm, the plan is to vote on all these proposed amendments at once, right? So we won't end up with a situation in which this amendment passes but the Charter amendment does not? (02-02-2019, 02:10 AM)Pronoun Wrote:(02-01-2019, 03:39 AM)Roavin Wrote:(01-31-2019, 09:20 PM)Ryccia Wrote: Opposed. The Assembly should have a say, not an one-sided choice. Yes, that is my understanding. I believe it will follow the precedent set by the Omnibus Package (Court Reform). |
![[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]](https://i.imgur.com/XXPV74Y.png?1)
![[-]](https://tspforums.xyz/images/sidr/blue/collapse.png)
![[Image: flag%20of%20esfalsa%20animated.svg]](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/esfalsagov/esfalsa-graphics/main/flag%20of%20esfalsa%20animated.svg){kind=small}
![[Image: rank_officer.min.svg]](https://raw.github.com/TheSouthPacific/tsp-graphics/master/mod/spsf/min/rank_officer.min.svg){kind=icon}
![[Image: updates_lifetime_2.min.svg]](https://raw.github.com/TheSouthPacific/tsp-graphics/master/mod/spsf/min/updates_lifetime_2.min.svg){kind=small}
![[Image: defenses_lifetime_4.min.svg]](https://raw.github.com/TheSouthPacific/tsp-graphics/master/mod/spsf/150w/defenses_lifetime_4.min.svg){kind=small}
![[Image: detags_lifetime_3.min.svg]](https://raw.github.com/TheSouthPacific/tsp-graphics/master/mod/spsf/min/detags_lifetime_3.min.svg){kind=small}
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |