We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Poll: Should Nat be appointed as Associate Justice?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Aye
61.90%
26 61.90%
Nay
0%
0 0%
Abstain
38.10%
16 38.10%
Total 42 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

[PASSED] A1911.04: Nomination of Nat as Associate Justice
#1

Legislators,

Nat has been nominated to become an Associate Justice. A motion to vote on this nomination has been seconded. 

The debate thread can be found here.

As a vote on an appointment, the vote will last 3 (three) days, ending at 23:15 UTC on 3rd December 2019. The vote requires a simple majority to pass.

Please vote by poll if possible. If you cannot vote by poll, post 'Aye', 'Nay' or 'Abstain' in this thread. Please do not vote both by poll and by post. Comments and discussion belong in the debate thread and may be moved there.
#2

Legislators,

the appointment of Nat as an Associate Justice has passed.

[Image: TlDMSl8.png]

There were 42 votes in total: 26 ayes and 16 abstains.

The vote was passed with 100% voting in favour, exceeding the requirement of a simple majority excluding abstentions.
[-] The following 2 users Like Nakari's post:
  • phoenixofthesun14, Seraph




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .