Users browsing this thread:

Nakari · 04-21-2020, 10:46 PM

Perhaps influence can be a requirement to become CRS, but not a requirement for continuing to be a member. A member would still have to maintain endocount, but wouldn't need to be concerned about using their influence.

**Griffindor** · 04-22-2020, 12:18 AM

(04-21-2020, 10:06 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:
(04-21-2020, 03:43 PM)Griffindor Wrote: Perhaps inserting a clause that says along the lines of "if a CRS member falls below the requirements for membership [due to them carrying out their duties as a CRS member] then they have X number of days/weeks/etc. to come back into compliance before being removed [perhaps as an RO not the org itself?] from the CRS.".

Let's keep in mind that membership isn't only about the legitimate use of border control powers. Part of the job is also lending one's security and other skills to help safeguard regional security. Just because someone isn't meeting the full requirements at the moment shouldn't necessarily mean a loss of membership, assuming all other aspects of the job are being discharged.

Fair point; that is why in brackets I inserted a potential transfer of that specific RO spot to someone else on the CRS that has a higher influence.
Membership loss: no
RO loss: maybe

-Griffindor/Ebonhand
-Current Roles/Positions
-Legislator 2/24/20-
-High Court Justice 6/7/20-
-South Pacific Coral Guard 11/17/20-
-Minister of Engagement 6/17/22-

-Past Roles/Positions
-Legislator 7/3/16-4/10/18
-Secretary of State 4/3/20-2/24/21
-Chair of the APC 9/24/16-5/31/17
-Vice-Chair of the APC 6/1/17-4/10/18
-Local Council Member 7/1/17-11/17/17
-Citizen 5/2012-12/2014 and 2/26/16-7/3/2016

**Jay Coop** · 04-22-2020, 01:00 AM

I'm not in a position to tell the CRS how to handle its internal matters, but I think the RO positions for the CRS should remain in the hands of those who are most active RMB-side, mostly to handle matters of moderation.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

**Amerion** · 04-23-2020, 10:36 AM

I motion a vote.

***Roavin*** · 04-23-2020, 10:40 AM

Second.

***Tsunamy*** · 04-23-2020, 10:40 AM

(04-23-2020, 10:40 AM)Roavin Wrote: Second.

Damn it! I wanted to do that!

-tsunamy
[forum admin]

**Amerion** · 04-25-2020, 02:29 AM

Bump.

phoenixofthesun14 · 04-25-2020, 02:58 AM

My apologies on forgetting to get this to vote, I'll get that done ASAP

Asia and Pacific · 04-25-2020, 03:43 AM

I support this motion. CRS are the ones we are entrusting the security of our region. If increasing its membership requirements increases our regional security we should definitely do it. I do have one question about the influence requirement. What if during a purge the influence of a CRS member goes below Apprentice? Are they replaced by someone else as RO? And if they recover the lost influence are they reappointed as a RO or Does CRS wait for another purge to occur during which another CRS' s influence goes below Apprentice.

(04-21-2020, 10:46 PM)Nakari Wrote: Perhaps influence can be a requirement to become CRS, but not a requirement for continuing to be a member. A member would still have to maintain endocount, but wouldn't need to be concerned about using their influence.

I believe this approach would be the best for the influence requirement. We want to keep the CRS panel as uniform as possible. We want less changes in it as possible. Having variety of members given CRS RO authority over our region can be a risk in the future.

Former Cabinet Advisor
Former Minister of Military Affairs
Proud Citizen and Legislator of the South Pacific.
Nation in the South Pacific- Asia and Pacific.
Soldier in the South Pacific Special Force.

(This post was last modified: 04-25-2020, 03:51 AM by Asia and Pacific.)