We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[PASSED] Regional Officers Act ambiguity
#1

Quote:2. Regional Officers

(2) The Prime Minister will be granted all non-Border Control powers.

(3) The remaining Cabinet ministers will be allotted between one and four up to three Regional Officer positions and granted Appearance, Communications, and Polls powers. They will decide which Cabinet ministers among them will be granted Embassies power.

Fairly self-explanatory. Clause is ambiguous about whether it includes PM.

From internal discussions amongst the Cabinets and CRS, most of us seemed to agree five Cabinet ROs were too many (we were leaning only assigning half that) so I've gone for the interpretation where there are between 1 to 4 total Cabinet RO, including the PM.
[-] The following 2 users Like Farengeto's post:
  • Seraph, Somyrion
#2

All of the Cabinet ministers should be granted RO positions if there is space.
#3

(10-21-2020, 12:54 AM)Domais Wrote: All of the Cabinet ministers should be granted RO positions if there is space.

I recommend reading the discussion thread from when we changed this.
[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]
#4

I motion to vote on this bill.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
#5

Second
#6

This has been brought to a vote here.
#7

This has passed.




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .