Now, it may be that I have misinterpreted this, but the clause below doesn't make much sense. If there were only two votes in a month, it's mathematically impossible for a legislator to be absent for more than half of all votes. If there was such a scenario, they'd miss a mathematical maximum of 50% of all votes for the month, which is not more than half – it is exactly half. Now, if the minimum was three votes, then the mathematical maximum of missed votes would be 66.6...%.

Legislator Committee Act
An act to establish a commission to manage legislators

...

3. Legislator Checks

...

(3) A legislator fails the voting requirement if they are absent for more than half of all votes finished in the previous calendar month if a minimum of three two votes occurred.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply

Well, technically, if they vote in one of the two votes that would put them at "half of all votes" not "more than half of all votes"; thus only missing both votes would disqualify a legislator.

-Griffindor/Ebonhand
-Current Roles/Positions
-Legislator 2/24/20-
-High Court Justice 6/7/20-
-South Pacific Coral Guard 11/17/20-
-Minister of Engagement 6/17/22-

-Past Roles/Positions
-Legislator 7/3/16-4/10/18
-Secretary of State 4/3/20-2/24/21
-Chair of the APC 9/24/16-5/31/17
-Vice-Chair of the APC 6/1/17-4/10/18
-Local Council Member 7/1/17-11/17/17
-Citizen 5/2012-12/2014 and  2/26/16-7/3/2016

Reply

Oh yeah, that's right. Damn, what a brain fart.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply