We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Poll: Should Roavin be appointed to the High Court?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Aye
69.12%
47 69.12%
Nay
2.94%
2 2.94%
Abstain
27.94%
19 27.94%
Total 68 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

[PASSED] A2102.02 Nomination of Roavin to the High Court
#1

Legislators,

There has been a seconded motion to bring the nomination of Roavin to the High Court to vote. The debate thread can be found here.

As this is a nomination to the High Court, it requires a simple majority (greater than 50%) to pass. The voting period will last 3 days, ending on February 9 at 19:00 UTC. (19:00 in London, 14:00 in New York, 6:00 on the 10th in Sydney)

Please vote by poll if possible. If you cannot vote by poll, post 'Aye', 'Nay' or 'Abstain' in this thread. Please do not vote both by poll and by post. Comments and discussion belong in the debate thread and should be posted there.
#2

This has passed with a 96% majority (47 Ayes, 2 Nays, 19 Abstains).
[-] The following 1 user Likes Purple Hyacinth's post:
  • Stan Melix




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .