Clarification, please. - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Government District (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Cabinet (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-32.html) +--- Thread: Clarification, please. (/thread-1896.html) |
RE: Clarification, please. - TAC Saxton - 03-15-2015 What difference does it make whether or not it was announced before or after the appointment? RE: Clarification, please. - Wolf - 03-15-2015 From what I gather from the original post in this topic, trust. RE: Clarification, please. - Punchwood - 03-15-2015 Yes who is the replacement? RE: Clarification, please. - Kris Kringle - 03-15-2015 Read the official statement. RE: Clarification, please. - Punchwood - 03-15-2015 (03-15-2015, 02:38 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: Read the official statement. Yes I just saw before this, however I don't think it would have killed you to just have said. RE: Clarification, please. - Wolf - 03-15-2015 That can be found here by-the-by. I noticed no one had linked it in this thread before now. Also, spoilers, it's Feirmont. RE: Clarification, please. - Tsunamy - 03-20-2015 I fully missed this discussion until right now. While I'm all for openness and transparency, I'm hardly going to take flack for not creating some grand announcement that Raven left. Moreover, I don't think there's ever been a time when the resigning minister has left without a public announcement of their resignation — unless it was due to inactivity — so we're in a bit of uncharted waters. More productively, perhaps we need to figure out what can be assumed to be known through discussions on IRC and what can't. |