I can't be bothered to make a point by point response, so I'll just respond to the main points you made.

1. There lies our problem. I don't think there are different degrees of gravity when it comes to coups, in no small part because it'd be misguided to quantify the damage. They tried to overthrow the government. That is damage enough. I don't understand a scenario where we tell a couper that it's ok because they were justified.
Defamation? Corruption? Espionage? Those are all crimes, but there can be certain leniency, and leniency might even be desirable in certain cases, because damage was limited to specific individuals. A coup is different, and that is something I don't think enough people are taking into account. I was personally affected, but the real issue is someone thought they have the right to overthrow the entire government, and we just told them it's ok. Coups should be the one red line nobody should ever cross.
This is also something important to consider: the forum crisis is not a justification for the coup. Why? Because nobody forced the Cabinet to coup, nor was it the only option out there. Was talking to admins not an option? Was consulting the Assembly not an option? Was proposing reform bills not an option? If couping is really a valid response to events, then would Escade have been justified in couping during the previous forum move. Absolutely not. Because we have procedures, and at the end of the day the Cabinet has no greater right than that of ordinary citizens to enact legal change.
I keep saying this over and over again. It's not that the Cabinet didn't have a right to have issues, it's that having issues can't possibly justify couping. Have I expressed opposition to us discussing those issues? Have I said we should shut down all discussion regarding the motives of the Cabinet. I haven't! All I ask is that we acknowledge that couping, no matter who or how many people were ejected, is not a solution.

2. I know this will be a very unpopular opinion, but I don't believe Forum Administration should be accountable to the government. I absolutely believe in admin accountability, but to the forum users, not to the government, which is an important distinction to be made. I think every user should have a right to question administrators and expect good behaviour (which is why we are working on developing internal conduct guidelines), but I don't believe any administrator should be subjected to political accountability, because then our actions would be affected by the fear of political repercussions (and that really is happening nowadays), when that shouldn't be the case.
If you want to know why I believe that, it's because I don't believe the forum exists solely as a headquarters for the regional government, nor do I think administration should answer solely to the regional government. There are many foreigners and non-citizens who use this forum, just as there are other communities beside the regional government, and we keep it for them too. Making admins answerable to the government, as opposed to the entire user base, would give the government a greater role than what it should have.

3. There have been no viewing and posting settings changes related to your declaration as a security threat. The only area whose settings were changed was the Election Central, which was restricted to citizens, and that affected every non-citizen equally, so it was completely unrelated to your status. In fact, here is a complete list of sections whose access is limited:
- Moderation Back Office (only mods and admins)
-Administrative Back Office (only admins)
- Private Halls of the Assembly (citizens)
- Voting Chamber (citizens and up)
- Cabinet Office (only Cabinet)
- MoFA Office (passworded, any registered user)
- MoRA Office (Fellowship masking, any registered user)
- Court Office (only Justice)
- CSS Office (only Delegate, Vice Delegate and CSS)
- Parole Board Office (only Vice Delegate, Chair and Justice)
- Base Camp (only SPSF)
That's it. In your previous condition as a non-citizen, the only areas you would've absolutely had no access to would've been the Mod/Admin Offices, the Private Halls, the Voting Chamber, the Cabinet Office, the Court Office, Lubyanka and the Parole Board Office. Aside from those, citizens and registered users have the same level of access.
We need to stop this tendency of accusing admins of power abuse when they make decisions we don't agree with. It's not abuse of power when non-citizens don't get access to the elections area. It'd be abuse of power is we restricted access to citizens, since they do have a legal right to run for office and vote for candidates. You might find it inadequate and distasteful, and I welcome you to post in the Op Centre with your arguments for making the Election Central more accessible, but it definitely was not abuse of power.

4. It's not only you. Let's admit that there is a very clear tendency in the Assembly to take more seriously those who argue in favour of your version of reconciliaiton, and to portray as toxic those who oppose it. The problem with this is it stops being reconciliaiton, as much as simply silencing the other side. I'm 100% sure that we will cotinue to minimise the coup and treat the coupers with great amounts of sympathy, even as we treat those directly effected with zero sympathy and even with disdain.
I know people desperately want us to get along and simply stop fighting, but I don't know you can expect me to do that when what everyone calls reconciliation looks to me as "save your opinion, because we don't want it here". That is how I feel every time I post my opinion in the Assembly.
You said amnesty in exchange for admisison of culpability was an acceptable compromise. But we haven't asked anyone from the Cabinet to acknowledge their guilt. Scylla posted on his own accord. Sopo said he didn't regret a thing about the coup. SJS Republic posted an apology. But nobody from your side publicly called on him to make good on that requirement, and nobody is calling on Imkitopia to do so either. That is the kind of gestures that make me thing this isn't reconciliation as much as forcing me to accept everything. I'm being such a pain in the ass because all this time I feel everyone is on the side of the coupers, but nobody's on my side, or even trying to understand it.
At least your above post had half a line saying you understand how I feel. But nobody else from your side even says that, and the implication is I should feel wrong for not immediately forgiving and trusting the people who ejected me and mounted a defamation campaign against me. And that sucks, because I don't even see this as people being equally critical of them as they are of me, I see it as being critical of everything I did and didn't do, but being forgiving and understanding of what the Cabinet openly did; I see it as people saying we should forgive the Cabinet, but (and even while so many lies have been told about me), I shouldn't be forgiven.
I mean, hell, do you and everyone else at least understand now why I keep arguing like this? Because it sure gets tiring if I'm not even getting across to people.