Point of Order - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: Point of Order (/thread-4134.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Point of Order - Omega - 05-29-2016 Mr. Chair, we have not yet been certified as legislators. Might I ask that something be done about that or else anything we do will be illegal so long as this is the case. RE: Point of Order - Roavin - 05-29-2016 While it's not explicitly mentioned in the continuing resolution, I would assume that anybody that was masked as citizen is initially legislator going forward. But yes, we do need to make the administrative and procedural changes soon. RE: Point of Order - Belschaft - 05-29-2016 This is more an admin thing than a Chair of Assembly thing; the forums and maskings need to be rearranged appropriately first. RE: Point of Order - Roavin - 05-29-2016 Well it's a CoA thing insofar as the CoA, the CRS and the admins need to work out a process for approvals under the new laws. I'm sure they're already working on it, though. Point of Order - sandaoguo - 05-29-2016 We (admins) haven't had a chance to do the book keeping yet. But the cit mask just needs to be renamed Legislator. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: Point of Order - Omega - 05-29-2016 Okay thank you. RE: Point of Order - Awe - 05-30-2016 (05-29-2016, 04:23 AM)Roavin Wrote: While it's not explicitly mentioned in the continuing resolution, I would assume that anybody that was masked as citizen is initially legislator going forward. But yes, we do need to make the administrative and procedural changes soon.Can confirm that it would be the case, as previously discussed in the GC, with the exception of people whose citizenship have lapsed Sent from my MI NOTE LTE using Tapatalk RE: Point of Order - Awe - 06-02-2016 To get things going on my end, I have come up with a draft Legislator application Quote:Nation in the South Pacific:I feel that this is less onerous than having to list out all regions you have ever been a part of. I need help refining the oath bit though, which I think is essential now that Legislators are held to higher standards than citizens in the past. Quote:This is for people who wish to renounce their membership in a Prohibited Group. Thoughts? RE: Point of Order - sandaoguo - 06-02-2016 I think the renunciation would just be a piece of paper, without any kind of concrete evidence or follow-up. With a group like The Empire, there's no way to verify that a member has left. We're talking only about a handful of players there, so I wouldn't want to open up a hole in the Prohibited Group system just so Biyah or Dali can join TSP. I think the CRS would need to verify that somebody really has left, and they should have the power later on to place them back on the list if any evidence is discovered that they lied or rejoined. The application is fine by me, though. RE: Point of Order - Farengeto - 06-02-2016 I second GR on the renunciation, but the application is fine. |