PASSED: Regional Communications Act - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: PASSED: Regional Communications Act (/thread-4385.html) |
RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Roavin - 08-17-2016 I think we can motion, no? Motion to vote (on the latest revision I posted). Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Kris Kringle - 08-17-2016 (08-17-2016, 02:36 PM)Punchwood Wrote:(08-17-2016, 09:32 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote: It's funny because it's so ridiculous. I wasn't referring to the vast majority of people arguing for common sense solutions to this issue. RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Seraph - 08-17-2016 I second Roavin's motion. RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Omega - 08-17-2016 (08-17-2016, 03:17 PM)Roavin Wrote: I think we can motion, no? Was that a motion on the Act and the Amendment or just the Act? I will bring this to a vote tonight assuming the current at vote legislation passes, and if no one believes we need to discuss this longer. If someone does believe we need more discussion I need you to speak up in the next few hours. RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Drugged Monkeys - 08-17-2016 I think k we need more discussion. I would request at least 24 more hours RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Omega - 08-17-2016 (08-17-2016, 04:21 PM)Drugged Monkeys Wrote: I think k we need more discussion. I would request at least 24 more hours Granted. If after 24 hours or more general consensus comes that we are done the above motion will still be noted. RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Roavin - 08-17-2016 Just a heads up, I made a very small grammatical fix in (3) - I forgot the word "of" (thanks Seraph!). RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Belschaft - 08-17-2016 I'm hoping to get some input from the region at large on this, so would appreciate if there's no rush to vote. RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Roavin - 08-17-2016 (08-17-2016, 06:03 PM)Belschaft Wrote: I'm hoping to get some input from the region at large on this, so would appreciate if there's no rush to vote. That'd be great. How are you planning on doing so? RE: Proposal: Regional Communications Act - Drugged Monkeys - 08-18-2016 (08-14-2016, 03:44 PM)Roavin Wrote: Some changes to my revised draft based on discussion here and on Discord. One issue I see for sure is the use of the word "reasonable" in 2.1.C. There is no way to quantify "reasonable". We had this same issue come up recently when the CoA was absent for awhile, and we didn't know how long we had to wait to put something to vote ourselves because the charter says "a reasonable timeframe" in regards to the CoA being absent or unable to carry out the duty of putting legislation to vote. |