+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+----- Thread: Charter v. Legislator Application discrepancy (/thread-4795.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Charter v. Legislator Application discrepancy - Tsunamy - 01-29-2017
(01-29-2017, 10:29 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: My logic here is that this isn't really his post (as in, a statement solely him, reflecting his opinion) as much as a government post whose author he happens to be. It could've been made by whoever was Chair at the time, and the contents would've been the same. Same reason why the previous citizenship thread was updated to reflect changes to citizenship law.
We could always just switch post ownership, if anything.
I really don't have any interest in arguing over this; nor did I realize asking someone to create a new thread was such an earth-shattering idea. Feel free to do whatever you see fit, Kris.
RE: Charter v. Legislator Application discrepancy - Griffindor - 01-31-2017
(01-29-2017, 10:48 PM)Escade Wrote: I like the idea of creating a new thread too, multi=page threads that aren't spam can be a bit much for people scrolling through.
EXACTLY! Most people including me freaked out when I saw all the pages, most don't even stay active after registering and becoming a legislator.
Maybe we could put an amendment requiring that all TSP registration threads are archived after a year, and made anew. Reduced clutter and confusion is key to expanding the active membership.
RE: Charter v. Legislator Application discrepancy - Escade - 01-31-2017
Sounds like a good idea, archiving the threads and if needed just tracking a list (like I saw an Excel file somewhere that did it well).
RE: Charter v. Legislator Application discrepancy - Roavin - 02-01-2017
Some other places have dedicated sub-forums, with one thread per applicant. That's also a model that could be considered.
Though, honestly, it matters little.