[TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Government District (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: High Court (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-50.html) +--- Thread: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac (/thread-5579.html) |
[TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Kris Kringle - 10-16-2017 Filed:
In accordance with Chapter 4 of the Court Procedures Act, the following steps shall comprise the Trial of Roavin v. Cormac:
In accordance with common standards for the maintenance of order in the courtroom, only the Prosecution and the Defence, as comprised by the Complainant, the Defendant and their respective Counsels, will be allowed to post in this thread, and any and all posts from other sources, save relevant posts by Forum Administration, will be removed from view. RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Belschaft - 10-20-2017 Your honour, Defence requests leave to present an extraordinary motion for a declaration of mistrial. RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017 What motive does the Defence have to request such leave?
RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Belschaft - 10-21-2017 Your honour, The Court Procedures Act (CPA) requires that multiple High Court Justice's handle matters of criminal complaint and trial; repeated use of plural terminology such as "The High Court Justices will collectively determine" make this clear and unambiguous. As such Defence believes that a declaration of mistrial must be made. Defence has no objection to such declaration including a statement that no jeopardy is attached. RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Kris Kringle - 12-09-2017 In view of the ruling in Anachronism in the Court Procedures Act [HCLQ1712] and the subsequent denial of an appeal, the Prosecution will now have one full week to present its full case, including any relevant evidence and witnesses.
RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Roavin - 12-14-2017 Your honor, I wish to request for an extension to Monday, December 18th. (busy at work and am likely to be at work on Saturday, so this would allow me to find some time on Sunday to finish up what I've written - note that I'm posting this at 3am and I just came home from work not too long ago ) RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Kris Kringle - 12-16-2017 In view of the reasons provided, the Court will grant the requested extension.
RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Kris Kringle - 12-18-2017 It shall be reflected on the record that the Prosecution failed to present its main argument within the allotted time. The Defence will have one full week to present its argument.
RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Belschaft - 12-19-2017 Your honour, with the prosecution having presented no case the defense requests immediate dismissal with prejudice. RE: [TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - Kris Kringle - 12-20-2017 Given the advanced state of this case and considering the fact that the Prosecution has presented evidence and witness testimony, the Court has opted to continue with this proceeding, the request by the Defence notwithstanding.
|