(11-03-2017, 02:34 PM)Belschaft Wrote: How would you deal with this hypothetical scenario;

A piece of legislation is brought before the Assembly and motioned to vote. Having reviewed it, you believe that it directly contradicts the Charter. What do you do?

Proceed as normal. It's not for the CoA to decide. That's an issue for the court.

(11-03-2017, 07:36 PM)Pronoun Wrote:

(11-03-2017, 11:45 AM)rolandarmstrong Wrote: I'd definitely be supportive of loosening moderation policy. 

Do you have any specifics as to this?

Yeah, as I said, I'd be against the current one-sentence rule, I specifically think moderation needs to be done on a case-by-case basis. I think that as long as it doesn't slow down debate, we don't need to be deleting posts like some over-conscious moderator.

(11-03-2017, 10:32 PM)Drall Wrote:

(11-03-2017, 11:45 AM)rolandarmstrong Wrote: However, I'd definitely be supportive of loosening moderation policy. 

Would you say your thoughts on this come from your consistent "run ins" with moderation in the Assembly?

Absolutely not. While this may seem like it's true, the moderation policy in the assembly currently doesn't fuel debate, as it should, and prevents debate from happening.

Thanks for the questions, guys, I enjoy answering them, keep them coming!