(07-03-2018, 10:52 AM)Amerion Wrote: I may have misunderstood your meaning of the term but is it not the case that many, if not all effective forms of executive decision-making requires a strong decisive leader?

I am curious to what extent will you decentralise your authority in your efforts to practice a more consultative style of leadership?

(Edit: my apologies, I didn't see the second page where you gave an answer which largely applies to my question)

I think that a more decisive leadership style is more fit for the PM, than the delegate. The delegate doesn't have a lot of executive ability, and there's a good reason for this. Also i don't necessarily see that a leader who rules with the people is weaker than a "big man" leader. 

I plan on not changing the role of the delegate, but changing how i approach the role. I'm not afraid of an executive decision, but i think that working with people is better than working against them. Ultimately if i am to become the delegate, the things that are in my power are still my choice, but i can guarantee you that getting help from others wont hurt my ability to effectively lead.

(No need to apologize, most of a politicians job is to repeat themselves.)