or Create an account
  The South Pacific Government District Assembly of the South Pacific [DRAFT] [2234.AB] Reviving leave of absence reform

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[DRAFT] [2234.AB] Reviving leave of absence reform
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,932,900¢
#23
08-29-2022, 03:14 PM

I just don't see much of a point in arguing about the semantics of "definite" and whether it means a leave must be specified down to the hour. It seems the same like arguing about the meaning of "five days".
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
[-] The following 2 users Like Kris Kringle's post:
  • Jay Coop, Jebediah
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Reviving leave of absence reform - by maluhia - 08-21-2022, 09:20 AM
RE: Reviving leave of absence reform - by maluhia - 08-21-2022, 11:06 AM
RE: Reviving leave of absence reform - by A bee - 08-21-2022, 12:00 PM
RE: [DRAFT] [2234.AB] Reviving leave of absence reform - by Kris Kringle - 08-29-2022, 03:14 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Government District Assembly of the South Pacific [DRAFT] [2234.AB] Reviving leave of absence reform


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .