I would be interested in a mandatory summit, as proposed by Unibot. This allows for discussions between executive officials with a more in depth knowledge of how the alliance is doing, and what specific steps should be taken to strengthen it, something the Assembly is not in a position to do.

I still oppose Clauses 1.2 and 1.3. There is no real reason to include them, especially since we should not vow to recognise specific officials, but rather anyone legitimate holding the office. Who that official happens to be is irrelevant, and has no place in treaty text. I don't even understand why those clauses were included in the first place.