We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

The Lampshade Accords [The South Pacific-Spiritus]
#44

(03-16-2015, 07:44 PM)Sandaoguo Wrote: 2.5 is still unacceptable for me. Did Raven ever mention this clause to Spiritus? The legal requirement that we raid is unprecedented in our current collection of treaties.

If we want to do war games, that's fine. But we should leave it up to circumstances whether we raid or defend during them, rather than legally binding us to always raid.

I feel like those are intended to be examples rather than specific roles — especially if you look at the last sentence.   But I agree with rewording it.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]


Messages In This Thread



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .