We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Criminal Complaint: Belschaft
#1






HCCC105
- 11.04.15 -


Complainant
Quietdad

Defendants
Belschaft
Presiding Justices
Awe, Farengeto, Hopolis



Tired of having THIS hanging around unresolved, I submit that as evidence and hereby charge Belschaft with treasonn



Majority Opinion
Awe, Farengeto, Hopolis


Given that the link provided by the Complainant to have no concrete evidence and only involve discussions vilifying the Accused, the Court has chosen to dismiss this criminal complaint due to lack of evidence. This case will remain open for 72 hours to allow the submission of further evidence.

The Court wishes to make it clear that a dismissal should not be treated as absolute proof of non-guilt and only indicates a current lack of provided evidence to prove guilt.

Discussion on the matter of the parallel case by Escade will begin tomorrow following the start of the new Judicial term.


Messages In This Thread
Criminal Complaint: Belschaft - by Farengeto - 04-11-2015, 01:22 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .