We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Issue VII
#7

(08-24-2015, 02:44 PM)sandaoguo Wrote:
(08-24-2015, 07:50 AM)Darkstrait Wrote: Hmmm, I would say that the Southern Journal does, as of yet, remain neutral on most issues. A real shame the same cannot be said for SPINN.

I think the issue you have with the lastest SPINN publication is your own mistaken understandings of what an editorial is. The New York Times is a paper of record that provides largely unbiased news. Quite literally it's one of the few newspapers that can be used in a legal setting to prove legal claims. Yet it also has an Editorial Board that writes opinion pieces and endorses candidates and policies.

Newspapers have always had editorial content. By definition, that content is not neutral and unbiased. It's the opinion of the writers, which is why it's separated from the rest of the news content and specially labeled as an editorial.

Your beef with SPINN is that an editorial was critical of you. That doesn't make its non-opinion content biased.

What of the previous article?
Darkstrait  :ninja:

Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek

"Hats is very fashion this year."

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Issue VII - by Kris Kringle - 08-24-2015, 12:26 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .