We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

INVALID: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice
#12

(09-14-2016, 10:12 PM)griffindor13 Wrote: Section 2 - Assembly Disapproval
1. The Cabinet must submit their nominee to the Assembly, where a three-day debate will commence immediately following the nomination.
2. The Assembly may reject the nominee by passing a disapproval vote with at least three-fourths support of those voting, which must be up for vote for five days.
3. The nomination will be considered accepted upon the conclusion of the debate period, if a disapproval vote is not initiated, or upon the failure of a disapproval vote.

From what I see, the vote must be initiated within the three days or the nominee becomes approved...

Yeah, I already ruled on that point of order. My ruling was that at the end of the debate period the vote may start. And since we don't have a court that can rule on this we're calling it good.
Above all else, I hope to be a decent person.
Has Been
What's Next?
 
CoA: August 2016-January 2017
Minister of Foreign Affairs: October 2019-June 2020, October 2020- February 2021


Messages In This Thread
RE: INVALID: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - by Omega - 09-14-2016, 10:19 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .