We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

A non-ridiculous voting methodology for Delegate
#11

We definitely shouldn't be changing anything until after the election is done. I proposed this after learning that the vote counting process was completely different from what many of us thought it would be.

And just to clear the air, I was winning when this was proposed. In fact, it would have hurt me at the time. But I'm more interested in having a coherent preferential ballot, than winning an election. Right now, you're punished if your first choice wins the first spot. I don't think that's right. We ask people to list their preferences and tell them there'll be two winners. But then some people don't get to have a say in who the second winner is, because they voted for a popular candidate.


Messages In This Thread
RE: A non-ridiculous voting methodology for Delegate - by sandaoguo - 01-10-2017, 09:45 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .