Thank you, Somy - and I don't mean that sarcastically. I've long been bothered by a lack of accountability and debate during elections. Negative things can be brought up in a reasonable and respectable manner, as you have. It's only fair that it hits me, too, and you've certainly brought up reasonable topics of discussion.

So, to address the points, roughly in order:

On not getting the proscription reissue done: Yep. That's on me. We were talking to the court in a closed session afterwards, seeking clarification, but that's been done for a while now and I could (and should) have finished this up for the Cabinet already.

On refusing assistance: That's based purely on the fact that it involves the same evidence as that mysterious Item E. It may be declassified someday, and since you are somebody that is versed in GP, I'm certain you'll see why this thing is so damn sensitive then.

On not sharing the suspicions about IoU: These weren't my suspicions alone, and the explanation I gave yesterday weren't post hoc but rather talked to with regional security people contemporaneously. Pretty much any CRS person as well as multiple other tenured members of the region can confirm this. I take TSP's security very seriously, and I wouldn't keep any suspicion or such to myself. The CRS can confirm that I've annoyed them aplenty in the past years.

On not inviting IoU to the group DM: We already talked this over on Discord, but to summarize here: There was a credible suspicion that IoU's Cabinet bid during the special election wasn't in good faith, but rather intended to steal logs and other confidential materials for espionage purposes. I didn't want yet another avenue to be available for grabbing, even if that particular group DM wasn't particularly valuable at the time. You added IoU to the group later on - I understand why you did it, and I'm not resentful over it, but I would have appreciated had you actually asked me before doing so. I did have a (in my opinion) legitimate reason.

On communication and collaboration in the Cabinet: I know. I served as this region's Prime Minister for three terms (a full year), and as a Cabinet Minister proper for a combined total of five terms. The first two terms as Prime Minister were good, but the third was a prime example of what can go wrong when communication and collaboration are not as they should be. Some of the issues in my third term were surely my fault, and with the benefit of hindsight and time for introspection, I've learned alot.