(05-30-2016, 05:39 PM)Punchwood Wrote:

(05-19-2016, 12:15 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote:

The Admin Team thinks you would be fine using the Civil and Political Organisation Centre as it currently is, for the time being. While you do seem to be generating some content as of late, we also took into account the overall aim of keeping a reduced amount of subforums, for ease of browsing, and the fact that the Centre does not have much activity that APC threads might hinder. We are of course open to revisiting this issue should conditions change, but for now we think it would be best if the APC kept using the main Centre.

I would also like the apologise for the time we took to answer. This should have been quicker, and ideally it will be so in the future.

While I may not disagree with the fact that the APC does not currently need it's own sub-forum (may is the important word there) I do want to ask why the SPINN still requires one. It has not been active since November of last year whereas the APC has been active this whole month (including today). Is it not unfair to grant a newspaper company that has not been active for more than 6 months (almost 7)  it's own sub-fourm yet not grant an active political party one?

_{Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making}
^{Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator}

---

PREVIOUS ROLES

Former Delegate (x2.5)
Former Member of the Committee for State Security
Former Chief Justice of The High Court (x3)
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs (x2)
Former Chair of the Assembly (x3)
Former Minister of Security (x2)
Former Local Councillor (x2.5)
Former Forum Administrator
Former Minister of Media