(05-01-2016, 10:25 AM)sandaoguo Wrote: Immediately, sure, but they could join and maintain the status if they want a shot at being on the CSR.

I don't think we should adjust anything, honestly. What's written is the lower bound of where we *should* be. It's our responsibility to work hard to bring the region up to code, so to speak. Lowering the requirements just makes everything less secure. I don't really think it was a good idea, in hindsight, to let low-endo low-influence people into the CSS just because they were popular on the game side (which we did with Aram, iirc). Those people are useless in the position, because they can easily be banjected, when the whole point is to have people who can't be. In the past, we were lax because there was an understanding members would get their numbers up. But that didn't really manifest, in my experience.

A coup is a coup is a coup. If you come to power outside the laws of the region, or you are in power and usurp the laws, it's a coup. The term actually isn't ambiguous, despite Bel's attempt to make it so in the direct aftermath of Hileville's coup.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please explain how the legislator requirement make this "more secure"?

And, I'm not sure a coup is a coup is a coup, especially when it comes to allies. Winners get to decide what's a coup because history is decided by the winners. For example, if Hileville et al. has succeeded this would be called a appropriate rebellion against an unfair power — not a coup.