Working Group Drafts |
Why do you consider it to be 'static and undermanned'? Under the requirements as they're currently written, 8 players meet the influence requirements. At least another 2 or 3 are on the cusp of reaching the Vassal rank. (It's not just 73000, but also can be Vassal ranking, which is as low as ~51000 in TSP.)
In contrast, TNP's Security Council is 9 people. When I get time, I plan on graphing their influence distribution. What I can say now is that it's far more distributed than ours. The lesson here, in my opinion, is that we need a program that encourages influence dispersion. The CRS will be well-staffed with the current members who would meet the influence requirements. To me, there isn't a good reason to include players with less influence. Increased membership doesn't help if the influence requirements are lowered to the point where those members can be ejected or banned by a rogue delegate. |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |