I don't think the CRS should be forced to work with somebody they rejected. I'm concerned with basically creating a dysfunctional atmosphere because politics trumps the CRS's decision. If it's a case of the CRS arbitrarily rejecting a candidate for political purposes, that seems grounds for recalls. Assembly overrides just seem like they would promote problems: either by dismissing the CRS's objective opinion, or by bypassing the real problem if the CRS is acting politically.

The continuing resolution reappoints all current CSS members. So Sam would still be a member. I would prefer otherwise, but that's an issue already settled and we chose to not relitigate Sam's membership again. The requirement going forward is a must, in my opinion. It's just makes no sense at all to trust people to protect the government from a coup if they've participated in one themselves. It's not a vindictive proscription. A lot of us genuinely don't see how the two can be reconciled.

Amnesty was for protection against criminal prosecution only. It wasn't a retcon of their actions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk