We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Change to the Regional Officers Act
#10

(08-17-2016, 05:45 PM)Roavin Wrote:
(08-17-2016, 04:23 PM)Drugged Monkeys Wrote: I think this way makes more sense. It allows both to make the decisions, instead of leaving it with just one person holding all the power.

Do we want both to have to approve (as it seems you're implying, if I'm not mistaken)? That would require the language to change slightly, plus it'd be awkward as the Cabinet would then have to approve Cabinet positions too.

Honestly, I'd be against this. I'm happy to follow what the Cabinet wants, but I don't think the delegate should have to run these changes past the Cabinet. Speaking from recent experience, this is often done short term and in relative short order. Having to run this past the Cabinet — and, probably allowing the Cabinet to vote on it — would be detrimental to an active region.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]


Messages In This Thread
Change to the Regional Officers Act - by Tsunamy - 08-12-2016, 11:10 PM
RE: Change to the Regional Officers Act - by Tsunamy - 08-17-2016, 09:29 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .