(03-26-2017, 06:17 PM)Tsunamy Wrote: It doesn't. All it proves is that we're not over-reacting and taking care of Bel as a long-term threat as opposed to an imminent threat.

I agree. It's better to act carefully, particularly when we're taking action that sets precedent. For better or worse, this agreement is the first of its kind, and we need to make sure we get it right.