I tend to prefer more detailed and formal language for official statements () but I don't object to the measure itself.

EDIT: Since this vote seems to be on the actual statement, however, I must cast a Nay vote. I think there needs to be a more thorough explanation of why we believe Belschaft is a security risk (even if it's widely know, the statement is supposed to explain it) and why we think each preventative measure being taken is warranted. Our job isn't just to ensure regional security, but also to explain how each step we take is conductive towards a better enforced security.