Declassified: Resolution of Empire Concern |
Bel has provided his defense in the thread, and even posted his "deposition" of Roavin. So I think that's a requirement fulfilled.
As for this ex post facto argument-- it would basically mean that any security-threatening behavior that began prior to the passage of the SPA would be totally non-actionable, even if we know everything about it and consider it an ongoing and imminent threat. That's absurd for obvious reasons. Security isn't criminal law enforcement. Somebody can be a threat without breaking any laws at all. Regardless of that fundamentally true statement, using the SPA against Bel isn't ex post facto, because his actions *were* a threat before and they *remain* an ongoing threat now. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |