At what point does it become unreasonable to stymie action because you believe it's necessary to receive a carbon copy post from Belschaft, reiterating everything he has already said?

I have asked Belschaft to give us an additional official response to the dossier we have posted, or to simply let us know that he believes his public responses thus far suffice. This is something you could also have done, Kris, rather than grandstand about fulfilling technicalities and ignoring the substance of the law and this investigation.

There is a lot of mention of how "we" can't do this just because "we" decide we've done enough, and a lot of opinions about how much there's left to do. You haven't participated in this the entire time, to the incredible frustration of the rest of us here. I don't want to be very harsh, but there's a reality we need to acknowledge. You've been the least informed person throughout this whole process, and yet pretty much every aspect of the investigation has been molded and changed around the objections you bring up to the work others are doing. This isn't a job where you get to have the final say, but put in none of the work. If you want to be here, then you need to be here. That means being where we actually talk, Discord. Petty objections based on who started the server aren't an excuse to remain in the dark voluntarily. This body has *always* done 99% of its work through real time chat. If you have plenty to do elsewhere, to the point where you see no reason to engage in an investigation about a serious potential threat, then you ought to evaluate why you're here. I maintain these forums, run the Assembly, and moderate the NSGA, and I still have time to put in the work here too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk