(01-19-2018, 02:29 PM)Tim Wrote: (01-19-2018, 02:18 PM)Farengeto Wrote: As another matter, this leaves redundant treaties with TRR. How does the Cabinet intend to handle those?
(01-19-2018, 02:19 PM)Belschaft Wrote: I'm generally against multi-lateral treaties, but this is simple enough that it's got no obvious "This is going to collapse in six-months" issues.
My main question would be - considering our existing treaty with TRR - we aren't simply signing a bi-lateral treaty with TEP?
We're just seeing them as non-conflicting treaties that can both exist within the realm of the law.
That wasn't really my point/question Tim; we already have a treaty with TRR, and bi-lateral treaties are known to be more stable than multi-lateral ones. Why are we signing another treaty with TRR rather than a simpler one with TEP?
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
Former Delegate (x2.5)
Former Member of the Committee for State Security
Former Chief Justice of The High Court (x3)
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs (x2)
Former Chair of the Assembly (x3)
Former Minister of Security (x2)
Former Local Councillor (x2.5)
Former Forum Administrator
Former Minister of Media