(11-06-2018, 01:42 PM)Amerion Wrote: I understand the intent behind this amendment but is the scenario laid out not already covered under the bribery section?
Criminal Code, Article 1 Wrote:(8) Bribery shall be defined as the receiving or offering of undue patronage by or to any individual in order to influence behavior that the recipient would otherwise not alter.
I did not know you could bribe in threats. I should try that with a politician sometime.
Besides, under this logic, the "giver" of this "gain" is not a victim, and may be charged for being complicit in "negative bribery"
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)
Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)
Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)
"The 1% is like a 1% battery charge. It will die out if it is not charged(the charge is the 99%). But if you don't charge it, it will die for sure, sooner or later"
- Me (2001- Present)
"Change is the world's blood"
- Me (2001-Present)
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018, 02:18 PM by Ryccia.)
Reply