We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[DISCUSSION] Reorganization of the Assembly Forums and Archives
#15

(03-21-2019, 03:00 AM)Bzerneleg Wrote: What if we introduce an amendment to the Legislative Procedure Act, let's name it A.LPA.2. We bring the amendment to vote and it failed. Then another amendment to the Act got introduced, do we call it A.LPA.2 or A.LPA.3?

A.LPA.3. Just because A.LPA.2 got rejected, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I have seen so many archived debate threads being used in debates so that one can make a point without rewriting half the entire forums. A.LPA.2 is still an amendment, just it failed. So, we should call it "A.LPA.2.F" and assuming the next one passes, "A.LPA.3.P"
[Image: st,small,507x507-pad,600x600,f8f8f8.u5.jpg]
[-] The following 2 users Like Jebediah's post:
  • Bzerneleg, Roavin


Messages In This Thread
RE: [DISCUSSION] Reorganization of the Assembly Forums and Archives - by Jebediah - 03-22-2019, 12:41 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .