Users browsing this thread:

~~Wolf~~ · 04-08-2015, 07:57 PM

Don't joke, someone might get ideas.

***Tsunamy*** · 04-08-2015, 10:27 PM

(04-08-2015, 07:24 PM)Todd McCloud Wrote: Simply pass an executive order on it. Charter doesn't specifically say one can't.

EDIT: Joshing

Could we do it? I suppose so.

Still misses the point of reviewing the posts. Tounge

-tsunamy
[forum admin]

Hileville · 04-13-2015, 04:53 PM

I get that there are other things the Cabinet needs to work on. But this absolutely ridiculous. I requested this on 3/19/15. You cannot honestly expect me to believe at this point that you haven't had the time to review this request and determine if these threads are going to be released.

I'm tired of waiting and will be drafting an Assembly resolution compelling the release of these threads.

**Farengeto** · 04-23-2015, 02:54 PM

It's been more than a month and I fail to believe you haven't had time for this in that period.

04-23-2015, 03:07 PM

A vote is nearly finished.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TAC Saxton · 04-23-2015, 03:36 PM

I believe some of the requested information pertains to some pending questions/cases as well so, I would appreciate it if this were completed soon.

I am a Super Villain

***Tsunamy*** · 04-23-2015, 03:48 PM

(04-23-2015, 02:54 PM)Farengeto Wrote: It's been more than a month and I fail to believe you haven't had time for this in that period.

For most of that month we were doing several jobs since the court couldn't manage to make a ruling on the FA election.

And, as Henn said, we're completely a check and vote on it. Given the seriousness of this, I'd like all Cabinet members to read these before we release them.

-tsunamy
[forum admin]

~~Wolf~~ · 04-23-2015, 11:41 PM

I find that excuse of "we were doing FA stuff" to be a complete cop out.

There were three people appointed to do FA business in the time of election turmoil and the Cabinet themselves picked who those three people were. Furthermore, one of those three isn't even in the Cabinet and probably could have picked up any slack if need be.

No, this is simply a poor excuse to cover up for the fact that this request is months old and nothing has been done about it.

***Kris Kringle*** · 04-24-2015, 12:14 AM

Two of the three people are either on a LoA or busy with their own Ministry. I did help handle some FA business, but always deferred to Tsunamy. Since he himself has been quite busy IRL, I assume it has been quite difficult for the Cabinet to function at its best.

I understand the concerns behind this delay, but I would suggest giving the Cabinet the benefit of the doubt. Our Cabinets have never been in the business of covering up stuff, and I seriously doubt it would start now. I believe this is a simple case of other matters taking priority, which given recent circumstances I believe is quite reasonable.

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Aramanchovia · 04-24-2015, 12:33 AM

Thanks Kris. I can confirm that is pretty much the case.

Expect a response very soon. As has been mentioned in the last few hours, we are holding a cabinet vote on this. It is a decision for the whole Cabinet, which is why we are holding off untill all have had a chance to read and have their say, rather than rushing to release it, if some members may have legitimate reasons to not release it.